Social Movements


Andrea Silva
Graduate student, political science, UCR

Political participation has been justified as a way to mitigate social and economic inequalities (Verba and Nie, 1987). Social movements will enjoy better chances to gain entrance to the political decision-making process, if the political system provides a sufficient number of opportunities for oppositional activities (Tarrow 1996, 54). Cultural variables also influence the viability of a social movement (Gamson 1995; Mansbridge and Morris 2001).

This review moves away from general discussion of social mobilization (See Tarrow 1996, Edelson 2001, Giugni, McAdam and Tilly 1999, Castells 1985), focusing instead on the participation of immigrants in these movements. In addition to labor movements, immigrants have also mobilized to increase their civil, political, and social rights. Marshall’s understanding of “social rights” (Klausen 1995) as a “modicum” of economic protection, but more, the right to share in the social heritage and life standards prevalent in society. These rights are connected to the education system and social services (Marshall 1973, 66).

Immigrants and organized labor movements
At the turn of the 20th century, immigrants arriving from Europe met cold receptions from “natives,” but found employment opportunities in large industrial enterprises, leading to a congregation in urban centers. The mobilization of immigrants became integral in the labor movements in the nineteenth century as the increase in European immigrants offered leverage for an increase in wages and working conditions (Tichenor and Heyman 2007) Irish immigrants became highly organized following their settlement in the industrial centers of the Northeast. Labors movements grew with Irish-American labor leaders Terence Powderly, Grand Master Workman of the Knights of Labor, one of the many immigrant-focused harbingers of the American Federation of Labor. These organizations were a novel blend of labor movements and immigrant mobilization, as well as the inclusion of women and African-Americans (Forbath 1991, Walker 1991, Clauson and Clauson 2000). Additionally, different immigrant communities created their own labor unions, responding to AFL support for restricted immigration in the United States at the end of the nineteenth century (Foner 1974, Sorrentino and Krase 2000, Min 2002).

This rift between organized labor and the immigrant community is rich in academic research as scholars investigate the allegation of organized labor against immigrants who undermine wages and break union strikes (Horowitch 1912, Moreno 2006, 296, Taft 1964, Powell 2005, 173, Cherry 2003, Hollifield 1992). Although this rift exists today, actions to incorporate migrants in labor movements was occurring as early as the Second World War. The Bracero program of the 1940s brought migrant workers to the United States from México and the Filipines to fill the labor shortage left by the war. These migrants integrated into a larger struggle for farm workers’ rights on the west coast, later coalesced into the United Farmworkers (Acuña 2007, Griswold del Castillo and Garcia 1997, Shaw 2008, Berberoglu 2002).

The UFW has since expanded its advocacy to include rights for undocumented immigrants in the workforce (Akers Chacón, Davis and Cardona 2006, Aquino and Goizueta 1998, Wong 2006). Some argue a “revitalization” of immigrant labor organizing has taken place since the 1990s, specifically in urban centers like Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City (Milkman 2006, Wong and Shadduck-Hernández 2008, Acuña 2008, Abu-Lughod 1999), in some cases specifically emerging out of religious movements (Hondagneu-Sotelo 2008, Snow, Soule and Kriesi 2004, Jasper 1999, McAdam, McCarthy and Zald 1996).

Immigrants and Social Movements
The mélange between the labor movement and immigrant mobilization is one example a greater immigrant movements to further their social incorporation into American society. In addition to rights at the workplace, immigrants have mobilized to increase their sphere of influence to the civil, political, and social. The distinction in the United States between undocumented immigrants, naturalized citizens, and legal permanent residents creates another variable in understanding immigrant mobilization.

Scholars argue a link between the treatment of immigrants and mobilization of underrepresented citizens asserting their civil rights in the United States (Johnson 2004, Bardes, Shelley and Schmidt 2008), framing the struggle for immigrant rights as another struggle for civil rights (Dodd and Thomas 1999). The scope of immigrants’ participating has also expanded in light of September 11th, as Muslim Americans as well as other immigrants from the Middle East attempt to assert themselves against a cultural backlash from “native” Americans (O’Brien and Newman 2009).

Political participation by immigrants is limited in the united state because of a new institutional precedent barring non-citizens, however, before the 20th century, many states allowed some level of immigrant suffrage (Keyssar 2001, Rosenberg 1977). Mobilization for immigrant political participation has found some creative outlets, including the mobilization through family and naturalized citizens (Warner 2009).

Social rights, as defined the right to share in the social heritage and life standards prevalent in society. In 2006, the marches for comprehensive immigration reform were in part, an assertion of these rights (Oboler 2006, Tichenor 2009).

References

Abu-Lughod. Janet L. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America’s Global Cities.

Aquino, María Pilar And Roberto S. Goizueta. 1998. Theology: Expanding The Borders.Twenty-Third Publications.

Bardes, Barbara A., Mack C. Shelley And Steffen W. Schmidt, 2008. American Government And Politics Today 2008: The Essentials Cengage Learning

Berberoglu, Berch. 2002. Labor And Capital In The Age Of Globalization: The Labor Process And The Changing Nature Of Work In The Global Economy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Carolyn Wong. 2006. Lobbying For Inclusion: Rights Politics And The Making Of Immigration Policy. Stanford University Press.

Castells, Manuel. 1985. The City And The Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory Of Urban Social Movements. University Of California Press.

Chacón, Justin Akers, Mike Davis And Julián Cardona. 2006. No One Is Illegal: Fighting Violence And State Repression On The U.S.-Mexico Border. Haymarket Books.

Clawson, Dan And Mary Ann Clawson. 2000. “What Has Happened To The Us Labor Movement? Union Decline And Renewal.” The American Journal Of Sociology 106(2):303-349.

Doug Mcadam, John D. Mccarthy, Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives On Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, And Cultural Framings. Cambridge University Press.

Edelman, Marc. 2001. “Social Movements: Changing Paradigms And Forms Of Politics.”Annual Review Of Anthropology 30: 285-315.

Foner, Philip S.. 1974. History Of The Labor Movement In The United States: Policies And Practices Of The A. F. Of L., 1900-1909. International Publishers Co.

Forbath, William E. 1989. “The Shaping Of The American Labor Movement.” Harvard Law Review 102(6):1109-1256.

Forbath, William E. 1991. Law And The Shaping Of The American Labor Movement. Harvard University Press.

Giugni, Marco, Doug Mcadam, Charles Tilly. 1999. How Social Movements Matter. University Of Minnesota Press.

God’s Heart Has No Borders: How Religious Activists Are Working … – Page 214 Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo – 2008

Griswold Del Castillo, Richard, Richard A. Garcia. 1997. Cesar Chavez: A Triumph Of Spirit. University Of Oklahoma Press.

Heyman, Josiah C. 2007. “Grounding Immigrant Rights Movements In The Everyday Experience Of Migration.” International Migration 45(3).

Hourwich. Isaac Aaronovich. 1912. Immigration And Labor: The Economic Aspects Of European Immigration To The United States. New York: Putnam.

Jasper, James M.. 1999. The Art Of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, And Creativity In Social Movements. University Of Chicago Press.

Johnson, Kevin R. 2004. The “Huddled Masses” Myth: Immigration And Civil Rights. Temple University Press.

Jonas, Susanne And Suzanne Dod Thomas. 1999. Immigration: A Civil Rights Issue For The Americas. Rowman & Littlefield.

Klausen, Jytte. 1995. Social Rights Advocacy And State Building: T. H. Marshall In The Hands Of Social Reformers World Politics 47(2): 244-267.

Milkman, Ruth. 2006. L.A. Story: Immigrant Workers And The Future Of The U.S. Labor Movement. Russell Sage Foundation.

Min, Pyong Gap. 2002. Mass Migration To The United States: Classical And Contemporary Periods. Rowman Altamira.

Moreno, Paul D. 2006. Black Americans And Organized Labor: A New History.

O’brien, Jodi A., David M. Newman. 2009. Sociology: Exploring The Architecture Of Everyday Life Readings. Pine Forge Press.

Oboler, Suzanne. 2006. Latinos And Citizenship: The Dilemma Of Belonging. Macmillan

Powell, John. 2005. Encyclopedia Of North American Immigration

Rosberg, Gerald M. 1977. “Aliens And Equal Protection: Why Not The Right To Vote?”Michigan Law Review 75(5/6):1092-1136.

Shaw, Randy. 2008. Beyond The Fields: Cesar Chavez, The Ufw, And The Struggle For Justice In The 21st Century. University Of California Press.

Snow, David A., Sarah Anne Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi. 2006. The Blackwell Companion To Social Movements. Wiley-Blackwell.

Sorrentino, Frank M. And Jerome Krase. 2000. The Review Of Italian-American Studies.

Tarrow Sidney G.. 1998. Power In Movement Social Movements And Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press,

Tichenor, Daniel J. 2009. Navigating An American Minefield: The Politics Of Illegal Immigration.” The Politics Of Immigration Reform 7(3).

Verba Sidney And Norman H. Nie. 1987. Participation In America: Political Democracy And Social Equality. University Of Chicago Press.

Wong, Kent and Janna Shadduck-Hernadez. 2008. “Immigrant workers and the new American labor Movement.” In New directions in the study of work and employment: revitalizing industrial relations as an academic enterprise. Charles J. Whalen. (ed). Edward Elgar Publishing.